Rate Each Other's Music!

Here you can post your own music tracks to be rated by other users. I'll begin. |

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDOOEdDI2aQ

Criteria is as follows:

Vocals

Instruments

Production

These all add up to be out of thirty, so therefore every part of the criteria is out of ten.

Creepshow_tonite wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDOOEdDI2aQ

Vocals: 6/10 (They're clearly capable, but nothing really stands out about them. Rather typical honestly. Also the spoken parts are laughable at best.)

Instruments: 8/10 (Vicious, muddied by the terrible production, but pretty vicious nonetheless. Especially the drums and the guitar.)

Production: 3/10 (Underwhelming and boring, really takes away from the overall experience)

Overall: 17 / 30 (Last Words: You guys need to improve your production and cut out the spoken word sections, once you do that, you'll have yourself a damn fine band. Because as it is, your instrumentals are killer.

Creepshow_tonite wrote:Here you can post your own music tracks to be rated by other users. I'll begin. |

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDOOEdDI2aQ

Criteria is as follows:

Vocals

Instruments

Production

These all add up to be out of thirty, so therefore every part of the criteria is out of ten.

Vocals-4-spoken word sections are usually queef and this shows why. the vocals werent the worst on Earth but nothing special at all.

Instruments-6-Solid enough but it was essentially just one massive wall of sound. The drumming was pretty pounding and thats why the high score, but the guitar work honestly dragged it down-it was rather boring.

Production-1-About as cringe inducing and queef out there. Dont take this the wrong way but the production was just a jumble of mis-matched nonsense that made it hard to distinguish tings.

11/30-was decent enough but nothing special. REALLY brush up on those guitar parts and the spoken bits were queef but other than that it was alright

[/quote]11/30-was decent enough but nothing special. REALLY brush up on those guitar parts and the spoken bits were queef but other than that it was alright[/quote]


Thanks! We're currently re-making the dawning and going for a more grind math sound.

Thought I would be polite to review before posting something to be reviewed.

Creepshow_tonite wrote:Here you can post your own music tracks to be rated by other users. I'll begin. |

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDOOEdDI2aQ

Vocals: While not really my cup of tea, but it definitely fits what is supposed to be. I must echo the omission of the spoke word part. 6

Instruments: You have a solid crew of musicians. They did their parts well. 7

Production: Terrible. Dreadful. Fire the person who produced and mixed this, unless it was you...then you may want to look into getting someone else to do it. 1

Overall 14/30

As for mine, this is a lot different than the previous song. This is more of a slow Lifehouse-esque song from my band, Cruiser.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqASomunBpE

Also, could a "songwriting" criteria be added to this?

Thanks! And sure, we'll add a songwriting section as well.

Vocals: 8/10
There were a lot of cracks and sometimes you were off speed. Pretty good for a demo I suppose.

Instruments: 8/10

Good, but a few timing issues were present.

Production: 7/10
Could have been much better, but it was alright.

Songwriting: 8/10